.

State Rep. Candidate George Georgountzos Answers Readers' Questions

You asked and State Rep. candidate George Georgountzos answered your questions. This is also the first story in our "You Ask, Stoneham Patch Answers" feature.

You asked and State Rep. candidate George Georgountzos answered your questions. This is also the first story in our feature, in response to reader Tom's question: "It would be great if we could use the Patch forum to meet the future elected officials in Stoneham. We the voters could ask questions and the future elected officals could answer our questions. I'd like to know the person better that I'm possibly voting for."

Georgountzos, a Republican from Stoneham, is challenging incumbent State Rep. Jason Lewis, a Democrat from Winchester, for his seat. The State Rep. position represents the communities of Stoneham and Winchester.

Here are Georgountzos' responses to our readers' questions:

Bob Campatelli asked: "What can either candidate do to help improve Stoneham's budgetary issues?"

A state representative has two important roles to play vis-à-vis his or her relationship with town officials. First, the representative must be willing to work with the towns he represents to always seek out and take advantage of state aid or other grants that are available. But more critical, the state representative must foster macro-economic policies that promote job growth and employment and reduce waste. Sadly, despite litanies to the contrary, the incumbent consistently and regularly takes the “tax and spend” approach to government management of the economy rather than letting individuals and businesses do what they do best. His solution is more government, more programs and more oversight. As your State Representative, my main focus will be on improving the economic conditions so that our towns revenues will grow because more people will be employed, purchase homes, buy cars and the like, which will enhance the tax rolls for Winchester and Stoneham.

In the shorter term, Stoneham suffers from the imbalance of funding under Mass. Gen. L. c. 70, the aid to local schools, to the tune of about $500,000 per year. Again, my opponent has called for, and has pushed through, a comprehensive overview of the problem. This study is due to report in a few years; leaving Stoneham $2 million short from where it ought to be under the 17.5 percent formula. I believe a more immediate approach to attack this problem is to call upon lawmakers to actually follow the law and see that each community gets the full 17.5 percent of its core funding, or take immediate steps to make the system more fair. The fact that school districts like Newton, Dover, Brookline, and Medfield get their fair share under the formula where Stoneham, Swampscott and other more modest towns are left holding the bag. Are children in those more affluent communities worth more than ours here in Stoneham? 

Elaine Mitrano asked: "We have a huge drug problem in both towns, what do they suggest we do to get drug dealers off our streets and drugs out of the hands of our middle school children, and all our children?"

I think we need to look at making sentencing guidelines mandatory. Too often, criminals before certain judges walk away with short or no sentences in prison while others are released on probation, and often times become repeat offenders. With respect to drug use in our schools, the first solution must always be the parents. However, when families are ill equipped to deal with this very important problem, our criminal justice system needs to have the teeth and mechanisms to ensure that offenders suffer the consequences of their acts. A turnstile approach to punishing young offenders, with no real, serious costs to these young folks, does them no favors. Schools, working in conjunction with police and other public safety officials, play an important role in identifying these offenders and steering them towards programs already in place that are able to assist them in turning their lives around.

Mark asked: "In 2011 Massachusetts Taxpayers spent $93 Million on 54,732 Illegal Immigrants Health Care. Illegals put a strain on our finances with police and fire calls, court and prison cost along with taking Chap 70 funding from towns without Illegal Immigrants and giving it to towns with Illegal Immigrants so they are able to hire interpreters and English as a second language teachers. All at the expense of our own Children, Seniors and Veterans. What will you do to insure that our tax dollars are being used for legal taxpaying Bay Staters and their families?"

I could not agree more. Contrary to the repeated public positions of my opponent, I will vote to stop ALL public assistance to individuals who have no legal right to be here… PERIOD. If you are not here legally, you are not entitled to public assistance of any sort, and the burdened taxpayer has had enough of supporting such individuals, who often times occupy public housing units needed by citizens or legal immigrants, who drive up the costs of education because their children are in public schools, and who add to the costs of automobile insurance because they drive without coverage or in cars that are unregistered, unsafe and uninspected. Enough is enough already.

Tom asked: "What do...you have planned to curb drug use in our community for our students? Needles were recently found on Washington (Street) and most recently on Central (Street) in Stoneham. I would like to see random drug testing of our students in our town. Our students will be our community leaders some day. Let's head them in the right direction."

I refer you, Tom, to my answer above. Random drug tests may be a little too extreme, because the premise is that our young students are likely to be on drugs. It is better to identify truants, juvenile offenders, and others who use drugs and deal with them once they are known seriously, rather than forcing others to take a drug test when they have done nothing wrong. After all, these students aren’t in school by choice, like employees at a job; they enjoy the right to their public education. 

[Editor's note: We'll run State Rep. Jason Lewis' answers to the same questions once we receive them from his campaign office.]

Tom M October 11, 2012 at 01:57 PM
George you will get my vote for your answer to Marks question regarding Illegal Imigrants. We need more people like you representing us.
Jacquelyn Nacopoulos October 11, 2012 at 02:23 PM
Hello George, I just want to tell you... about the deaf people, the careers, the jobs. I am aware about it. All The Deaf People can do it. They are able to do it. They are not afraid of doing it. Because Their Dreams will come true. Whatever They want to do, They know Whatever They want to do. Whatever make them feel happy,comfortable,joy....about their future jobs, their future careers too. All The Deaf People are blessed by God. Good Luck To All The Deaf People . God Bless All The Deaf People. Smile. From JN,Stoneham,Mass
JT October 11, 2012 at 03:08 PM
Finally--here's a candidate who suggests working at finding real solutions to problems instead of just raising taxes to throw money at them. George's answers to these questions are knowledgable and specific, and show he's already focusing on ways to help residents in both Stoneham and Winchester address some of the more difficult issues each of our communities must tackle. He's got my vote!
Russ October 11, 2012 at 03:48 PM
There is no choice - vote for George! We cannot condone the democrat candidates' support of partial birth abortion, unisex bathrooms and welfare for illegal aliens. This is an opportunity that does not present itself often and we must seize the moment.
linita October 11, 2012 at 03:50 PM
George is focused on looking out for the taxpayers' wallets...and has the knowledge to rein in costs. He is a bright, personable person with a lot of ideas. It's time for new blood and someone who will actually consider his votes rather than voting according to party line. EBT reform must happen yet Lewis was one of only 33 who voted against it. Shame on him!
Mary Lou Bracciotti October 11, 2012 at 09:16 PM
George should receive a vote from every Stoneham voter. It has been 30 years since we have had someone from this town TRULY represent us. George is fiscally reponsible, knowledgeable, and capable. Quality education is everyone's concern. George understands the importance of local education aid reform (Chapter 70) and he will work to provide equality among communities. For Stoneham to have a voice in our state legislature is important. If you care about Stoneham, you will support George on November 6th.
dusty cronin October 11, 2012 at 11:00 PM
I like what I'm reading. My mind is made up.
KCLStoneham October 12, 2012 at 12:55 AM
I just want to say thank you for responding George, it's more than Jason Lewis bothered to do. Or maybe he just wants to see your answers first? ;) You have my vote as well!
Mark Ouellette (Editor) October 12, 2012 at 12:57 AM
Hi KCLStoneham, FYI: Jason Lewis' answers will be posted tomorrow.
KCLStoneham October 12, 2012 at 01:02 AM
Hi Mark! Thank you for your hard work :)
Mark Ouellette (Editor) October 12, 2012 at 01:03 AM
Thank you kindly. *Tips hat* :)

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something